● Compliance & Safety

How is a permit to work different from a SWMS?

A SWMS explains how to do a job safely, but a Permit to Work confirms it is safe to start that job right now. Confusing the two leads to contractors performing high-risk tasks in unstable environments. In Australia, the WHS Act 2011 mandates these controls for high-risk work, while OSHA in the US requires specific permits for hazards like confined spaces to prevent fatalities.


Ignoring the difference between method and authorization creates fatal gaps

In Australia, the WHS Act 2011 requires PCBUs to ensure high-risk construction work is managed through a Safe Work Method Statement (SWMS). In the United States, OSHA standards (such as 29 CFR 1910 and 1926) mandate strict permits for specific hazards to ensure the environment is controlled before entry. In our work with Australian and US organisations, we’ve found that treating these two documents as interchangeable is a common precursor to site incidents.

Paper-based authorizations fail when the job actually starts

Many organisations rely on paper logs or emailed PDFs that are never verified at the point of entry. This creates a disconnect where a contractor is “authorized” on paper but is not actually vetted against the real-time conditions of the site.

  • Contractors entering a site with a generic SWMS but no specific Permit to Work for that day’s location.
  • Permits signed off in a remote office but never verified by a site supervisor before work begins.
  • A lack of real-time visibility into which high-risk permits are active during a site evacuation.
  • Paper permits that are not linked to the contractor’s verified qualifications or contractor induction and check-in status.

Integrating authorization into the visitor management system

True protection happens when the permit is a digital gatekeeper, not a piece of paper. By linking the permit to a cloud-based visitor management system, you ensure that no one starts high-risk work without both the method and the permission being verified.

  1. Mandatory contractor induction and check-in must be completed before any permit is validated for site access.
  2. Digital verification of qualifications and licences is cross-referenced against the specific requirements of the SWMS.
  3. Active permits are tracked in real-time, allowing the site manager to identify exactly who is performing high-risk work during an emergency.
  4. Automated system alerts notify safety managers when a permit expires while a contractor is still signed in on site.

Time and People: Visitor Management That Works When It Has To

Time and People converts complex compliance obligations into working infrastructure through cloud-connected visitor management and real-time evacuation reporting. In our experience deploying systems across the UGL network, we’ve seen how standardising compliance messages and contractor induction and check-in across all locations eliminates safety blind spots. We focus on the technology that ensures your people are protected and accounted for.


Content prepared by Time and People — visitor and contractor management across Australia and the United States.

×